Skip to content

move setting description outside for loop in evaluation scripts #134

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 22, 2023
Merged

move setting description outside for loop in evaluation scripts #134

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 22, 2023

Conversation

labeeb-7z
Copy link
Contributor

This PR moves the pbar.set_description line outside of the for loop as discussed here in the following evaluation scripts :

@fengyuentau fengyuentau self-assigned this Feb 22, 2023
@fengyuentau fengyuentau self-requested a review February 22, 2023 02:35
@fengyuentau fengyuentau added the evaluation adding tools for evaluation or bugs of eval scripts label Feb 22, 2023
fengyuentau
fengyuentau approved these changes Feb 22, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@fengyuentau fengyuentau left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the fix! 👍

@fengyuentau fengyuentau merged commit d723253 into opencv:master Feb 22, 2023
fengyuentau pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2023
@labeeb-7z
move setting description outside for loop in evaluation scripts (#134)
d23727e
@WanliZhong WanliZhong added this to the 4.9.0 (first release) milestone Dec 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@fengyuentau fengyuentau fengyuentau approved these changes

Assignees

@fengyuentau fengyuentau

Labels
evaluation adding tools for evaluation or bugs of eval scripts
Projects
None yet
Milestone
4.9.0 (first release)
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@labeeb-7z @fengyuentau @WanliZhong